Ductile Iron vs Gray Iron: Design, Cost and Service Life Trade-offs — A Quick Guide

A practical selection guide for engineering and sourcing teams: ductile iron vs gray iron: ductile (EN-GJS) vs gray iron (EN-GJL) compared across design rules, cost, machinability, leak-tightness, and service life, with ASTM/EN grade maps, realistic wall-thickness/tolerance tables and a PPAP-ready QC checklist.

Executive summary: YBmetal helps you to choose each material

Choose ductile iron (spheroidal graphite, EN-GJS / ASTM A536) if:

  • You need higher strength and ductility (UTS ~ 400–700 MPa; elongation 5–14%).
  • The part is pressure-tight, impact- or fatigue-loaded (pump/valve bodies, steering knuckles, brackets).
  • You want lower leakage risk and better tolerance to shock loads.

Choose gray iron (lamellar graphite, EN-GJL / ASTM A48) if:

  • You prioritize damping, dimensional stability and machinability (machine beds, housings, stove/boiler parts).
  • The duty is non-pressure / low-impact, and cost sensitivity is high.
  • You need thin-wall sections with excellent vibration damping.

Cost index (same geometry, same process, same volume):
Let gray iron = 1.00. Ductile iron typically falls 1.20–1.40 due to Mg treatment, inoculation, and yield. If ductile lets you reduce conservative wall or replace weldments/steel, the total life-cycle cost per service-hour can still be lower.

Standards and grade map (so drawings are unambiguous)

Common grade cross-reference (ASTM ↔ EN)

FunctionGray Iron (ASTM A48 ↔ EN-GJL)Ductile Iron (ASTM A536 ↔ EN-GJS)
General utilityClass 30 ≈ EN-GJL-20060-40-18 ≈ EN-GJS-400-18
Balance strength/machiningClass 40 ≈ EN-GJL-25065-45-12 ≈ EN-GJS-450-12
Higher strengthClass 50 ≈ EN-GJL-30080-55-06 ≈ EN-GJS-500-7
High strength / lower ductilityClass 60 ≈ EN-GJL-350100-70-03 ≈ EN-GJS-700-2

Name the standard and revision year on the print: ASTM A48/A536, EN 1561 (EN-GJL), EN 1563 (EN-GJS).

Typical room-temperature properties (indicative)

MaterialUTS (MPa)0.2% YS (MPa)Elong. (%)Hardness (HBW)Notes
EN-GJL-250250–300170–220Damping, machinability
EN-GJL-300300–350190–240Thicker sections need control
EN-GJS-450-12450–550310–36010–14140–190Versatile structural grade
EN-GJS-500-7500–600320–4206–9170–220Strength vs machining balance
EN-GJS-700-2700–850420–5502–4220–270High strength, lower ductility

Test plan (what we actually run in-house): spectrometer chemistry per heat; Brinell hardness each batch; tensile per heat/lot; optional impact & metallography (nodule count/shape, matrix) for PPAP or critical parts.

Design implications: wall thickness, NVH, and leak-tightness

Minimum wall thickness by process (mm / in)

ProcessGray iron feasibleDuctile iron feasibleGuidance
Green sand (auto line)4–6 mm (0.16–0.24 in)5–7 mm (0.20–0.28 in)Best for regular shapes/volume
Resin sand6–10 mm (0.24–0.39 in)7–12 mm (0.28–0.47 in)Medium/large parts
Shell molding3–4 mm (0.12–0.16 in)4–5 mm (0.16–0.20 in)Thin-wall/high accuracy

Shop experience: thin-wall favors gray iron or shell molding; avoid isolated hot spots—use fillets and ribs to balance modulus.

NVH (noise & vibration)

Gray iron’s lamellar graphite provides high damping—ideal for machine bases and compressor housings. Ductile iron damps less but offers superior strength/ductility, preferred for structural or safety-critical parts.

Leak-tightness and pressure

  • Ductile has spherical graphite and typically lower inherent leak paths—better for pressure-tight bodies; combine with impregnation only if needed.
  • Gray is acceptable for non-pressure or low-pressure duties and excels in thermal stability.

Tolerances, shrinkage, and machining allowance

Casting tolerances (ISO 8062–3)

  • Use CT6–CT9 for most iron castings, depending on size/complexity.
  • Define general tolerances for as-cast surfaces and GD&T (flatness, position, profile) for machined features.

Shrinkage allowance (pattern compensation)

  • Gray iron: ~ 0.8–1.0%
  • Ductile iron: ~ 1.0–1.2%
  • Calibrate per geometry and process; we confirm on first-off with CMM/3D scan and update tooling if required.

Typical machining allowance (both units)

Casting size (rough weight)Green sandResin sandShell molding
≤ 5 kg (≤ 11 lb)1.0–1.5 mm (0.04–0.06 in)1.5–2.0 mm (0.06–0.08 in)0.8–1.2 mm (0.03–0.05 in)
5–20 kg (11–44 lb)1.5–2.5 mm (0.06–0.10 in)2.0–3.0 mm (0.08–0.12 in)1.0–1.5 mm (0.04–0.06 in)
≥ 20 kg (≥ 44 lb)2.5–3.5 mm (0.10–0.14 in)3.0–5.0 mm (0.12–0.20 in)1.5–2.0 mm (0.06–0.08 in)

Machinability & surface finish

Casting tolerances (ISO 8062–3)

  • Gray iron cuts “clean” thanks to free graphite—longer tool life and easier chip control.
  • Ductile iron is tougher; use appropriate inserts, speeds/feeds and coolant filtration to manage graphite/sludge.

Shrinkage allowance (pattern compensation)

  • Gray iron: ~ 0.8–1.0%
  • Ductile iron: ~ 1.0–1.2%
  • Calibrate per geometry and process; we confirm on first-off with CMM/3D scan and update tooling if required.

Typical as-cast surface roughness (Ra):

  • Green sand: Ra 6.3–12.5 μm (250–500 μin)
  • Resin sand: Ra 3.2–6.3 μm (125–250 μin)
  • Shell molding: Ra 1.6–3.2 μm (63–125 μin)

Finishing: blast media selection (steel shot vs grit) alters Ra; prepare surfaces per coating specs (e.g., ISO 12944 systems).

Durability and service life

  • Fatigue & impact: ductile iron’s higher elongation and nodular graphite deliver better fatigue life and impact resistance—key for hubs, brackets, pressure parts.
  • Thermal cycling: gray iron offers thermal stability and damping, good for stove/boiler parts and machine structures.
  • Corrosion: choose coating systems (zinc-rich epoxy, powder) to match the environment; pack with VCI for export.

Cost, yield, and lead-time: what really moves the number

DriverGray ironDuctile ironNotes
Raw metal & treatmentLowerHigher (Mg/inoculants)Ductile adds Mg treatment + inoculation control
Yield & riseringGoodSlightly lowerDuctile needs more conservative feeding on heavy sections
ToolingSimilarSimilarTool compensation differs (shrinkage/warpage)
MachiningEasierHarderTooling & cycle time typically ↑ for ductile
NDT/pressure testOften lighterOften heavierTooling & cycle time are typically ↑ for ductile
Lead-time (prototype→PPAP)3–6 wks tooling + pilots+1 wk typicalDepends on process and part size

Break-even tips: if ductility allows thinner walls or consolidates a weldment into one casting, it often wins on total landed cost + reliability.

YBmetal Quality plan (what a robust PPAP looks like)

YBmetal adopts PPAP for projects to ensure quality:

  • Incoming & melt: spectrometer chemistry per heat; charge tracking and traceability.
    Process control: sand system KPIs (AFS GFN, moisture, LOI), Mg/inoculation records, pouring temperature, yield.
    NDT: UT/MT for critical sections; X-ray (for steel and select ductile areas); leak test per drawing pressure.
    Dimensional: FAI + CMM on all datums/profiles; 3D scan for thin-wall or complex shapes.
    Mechanical: tensile & hardness per standard; optional impact; microstructure with nodule count and ferrite/pearlite.
    Documentation: Control Plan, PFMEA, PSW, layout report, material certs

RFQ checklist (send this with your drawings)

  • Drawing + standard and grade (e.g., EN-GJS-500-7 / ASTM A536 80-55-06).
  • Annual usage/batch size, target price or cost goal (optional).
  • Process preference (green/resin/shell) or performance targets (tolerance, Ra).
  • Critical features & GD&T; machining drawing or datum scheme.
  • Leak/pressure requirements, NDT coverage, and sample plan.
  • Coating/packaging specs; export destination.
  • Required documents (PPAP level, FAI, certs).

FAQs

Usually yes, thanks to spherical graphite and higher ductility, but casting design and NDT coverage matter just as much. We often pair ductile grades with leak testing and, when necessary, impregnation for very tight specs.

Reference ISO 8062–3 (e.g., CT7–CT9 depending on size). For machined features, control with GD&T (position/profile/flatness) and specify machining stock.

Typically, yes (tougher matrix). Use the right inserts, speeds/feeds, and coolant filtration to manage graphite sludge and maintain tool life.

Yes—especially with shell molding or optimized green sand. Keep sections uniform, add fillets/ribs, and validate with simulation + FAI.

We section per sampling plan and check nodule count/shape and matrix (ferrite/pearlite). Mechanical tests (tensile/hardness) must align with the specified grade.

Similar Posts

  • ·

    How to Pick Ductile Iron Grades: ASTM A536 vs EN-GJS

    ductile iron grades ASTM A536 vs EN-GJS Who this helps: Buyers and Design Engineers selecting ductile (nodular/SG) iron for housings, hubs, brackets, manifolds and pressure-tight parts.What you’ll get: a clean A536 ↔ EN-GJS cross-reference, typical property windows, and a practical grade selection path you can put on drawings. Prepared by YB Metal Solution. Share your…

  • · ·

    Gray cast iron: The Essential Guide to Grades & Uses

    Gray cast iron Who this helps: Design Engineers / Buyers selecting gray/grey iron for housings, bases, brake drums, pulleys and other non-pressure parts where NVH damping, machinability and value matter.What you’ll get: a practical gray iron casting guide—process options, ASTM⇆EN⇆ISO grade mapping, surface finish & CT notes, design rules, copy-paste drawing text, and when to…

  • · ·

    Cast Iron for Noise and Vibration Damping: Why Gray Iron Still Wins

    Cast Iron Vibration Damping Who this helps: Design Engineers / Buyers targeting low-noise, low-vibration (NVH) housings, bases, pump/gearbox frames, and brackets.What you’ll get: clear physics for damping, when gray/grey iron beats ductile iron or steel, grade & microstructure tips, DFM rules that kill ringing, copy-paste drawing notes, and an acceptance test plan you can run…