ISO 8062 Casting Tolerances Explained: CT Grades with Real Examples

Engineer’s guide to ISO 8062 casting tolerances grades—what they cover, typical capability by green/resin/shell, how to annotate drawings, and how CT interacts with GD&T and machining allowance. Includes real CMM examples (mm/in).

TL;DR — what ISO 8062 is (and isn’t)

  • ISO 8062-3 defines as-cast dimensional tolerances for castings using CT grades (CT1–CT16).
  • It does not control machined features—use GD&T for those (position/profile/flatness).
  • It also doesn’t set surface texture—use ISO 1302 for Ra.
  • In iron castings, typical capability windows: green sand CT7–CT10, resin sand CT8–CT10, shell CT6–CT8 (size/geometry dependent).

Typical CT grades by process & size (capability window)

Indicative windows from production programs (gray/grey & ductile iron). Use them to choose a grade; final capability is geometry-specific.

Notes

  • Shell achieves cleaner edges & lower Ra (1.6–3.2 µm); green sand is 6.3–12.5 µm.
  • Heavier sections and many cores widen variation → higher CT number (looser tolerance).
Max part envelope (largest overall dim)Green sandResin sandShell molding
≤ 200 mm (≤ 7.9 in)CT7–CT8CT7–CT9CT6–CT7
200–500 mm (7.9–19.7 in)CT8–CT9CT8–CT10CT6–CT8
≥ 500 mm (≥ 19.7 in)CT9–CT10CT9–CT10CT7–CT8

How to put ISO 8062 on your drawing (correct notation)

Use a general note for all as-cast features, then detail exceptions:

  • General as-cast tolerance: ISO 8062-3 CT8 unless otherwise specified.
  • Surface texture: As-cast surfaces per ISO 1302; Ra as shown.
  • Machined features: don’t assign CT—use GD&T (e.g., ⌀ datum A/B/C, position 0.2) and basic dimensions.
  • Per-feature CT (if different): mark specific faces/bosses with CT7/CT9 balloons or callouts.

Draft & shrinkage belong on the casting model/pattern spec, not as CT grades.

Real CMM examples (what we actually see)

Examples from production CMM layouts; single-point linear dims shown in mm (in). Each program passed FAI; as-cast only.

Example A — Gray iron bracket, 180 × 120 × 60 mm; green sand; target CT8

  • 100.0 mm boss-to-boss: +0.5 / −0.4 (0.020 / 0.016 in) → within CT8
  • 60.0 mm wall length: ±0.5 (±0.020 in)
  • 25.0 mm rib height: ±0.4 (±0.016 in)
  • As-cast Ra ≈ 6.3–12.5 µm; machining stock used 1.5–2.0 mm (0.06–0.08 in)

Example B — Ductile iron housing, 420 × 280 × 180 mm; resin sand; target CT9

  • 300.0 mm face-to-face: +1.2 / −0.9 (0.047 / 0.035 in)
  • 120.0 mm boss spacing: ±0.8 (±0.031 in)
  • 40.0 mm web height: ±0.7 (±0.028 in)

Example C — Gray iron cover, 220 × 170 × 35 mm; shell; target CT7

  • 150.0 mm length: ±0.5 (±0.020 in)
  • 80.0 mm width: ±0.4 (±0.016 in)
  • Near-net machined faces used stock 1.0–1.2 mm (0.04–0.05 in)

These are indicative—not normative values of the standard—but reflect what buyers can expect with good gating, sand control and inspection.

CT, GD&T and machining allowance—how they work together

  • CT grade = as-cast size variation; use it for non-machined features.
  • GD&T = functional controls on machined features (position/profile/flatness/runout).
  • Machining allowance = stock to clean up as-cast surfaces; pick by size & process:
Rough weightGreen sandResin sandShell
≤ 5 kg (≤ 11 lb)1.0–1.5 mm (0.04–0.06 in)1.5–2.0 mm (0.06–0.08 in)0.8–1.2 mm (0.03–0.05 in)
5–20 kg (11–44 lb)1.5–2.5 mm (0.06–0.10 in)2.0–3.0 mm (0.08–0.12 in)1.0–1.5 mm (0.04–0.06 in)
≥ 20 kg (≥ 44 lb)2.5–3.5 mm (0.10–0.14 in)3.0–4.0 mm (0.12–0.16 in)1.5–2.0 mm (0.06–0.08 in)

Choosing a CT grade—simple decision path

  • Pick process & size window → read table in §2.
  • Check geometry risks (thin walls, long spans, heavy junctions) → if risky, one CT looser.
  • Where machining cleans up → leave as-cast CT looser; tighten via GD&T after machining.
  • Pilot & validate → FAI + CMM/3D scan; adjust CT/GD&T before cutting hard tools.

Cost & risk notes (why CT tightens price)

DriverEffect when you tighten CT
Yield & scrapMore rework/scrap; heavier risers; more fettling
ToolingTighter process windows; more try-outs/iterations
InspectionMore CMM time; larger sampling; capability studies
Process shiftMight force shell over green sand for accuracy

Rule of thumb: every step from CT9 → CT8 → CT7 increases piece price and tooling/time—only tighten where it matters functionally.

YBmetal Quality & verification plan

  • Metallurgy & sand: spectrometer per heat; AFS GFN/moisture/LOI control.
  • Dimensional: FAI + CMM layouts; 3D scan on complex parts; capability (Cp/Cpk) on critical dims.
  • Records & traceability: heat/batch IDs; fixture/datums documented; photo records for special features.

RFQ checklist (tolerance-ready)

  • 3D + 2D drawings; mark as-cast vs machined clearly.
  • General CT grade target (e.g., ISO 8062-3 CT8).
  • GD&T for machined features + datum scheme.
  • Process preference (green/resin/shell) or required Ra/min wall.
  • Inspection scope (FAI/CMM, sampling level); NDT/leak test if any.
  • Volume, batches, PPAP level, coating/packaging, destination.

FAQs

CT grades apply to as-cast size variation. GD&T controls machined features functionally (position/profile/flatness). Use both—each in its place.

Yes. Use a general CT (e.g., CT8) and call out local exceptions (CT7/CT9) on critical faces or tall ribs.

ISO 8062-3 provides tolerance values by size for each CT grade. As a buyer, use our capability windows in §2 and validate with FAI/CMM on your geometry.

Fluidity/feeding differ; ductile needs more feeding & nodule control → often a looser CT on the same geometry/size.

Surface texture uses ISO 1302 (Ra); draft is a DFM/tooling parameter (not a CT). List them separately on the drawing.

Similar Posts