How to Set Fillet Radii for Iron Castings: 7 Proven Radius Rules That Work

Guided by YB Metal (Suzhou, China) — fillet radii for iron castings: green sand, resin/no-bake & shell molding under one roof, with machining, simulation-led gating/risers, and traceable QA.

Excerpt: Smart fillets, radii, and transitions lower stress concentration, improve fill/feeding, and reduce machining and scrap. Use these 9 proven rules, copy-paste tables, and notes you can drop into your drawings and RFQs today.

Table of contents

  • Why fillets & radii matter (stress + flow)
  • 9 proven rules (copy & use)
  • Radius tables by wall & process (mm/in)
  • Transitions & Kt: what to avoid, what to blend
  • Flow-friendly features (hot-spot & feeding tips)
  • Machining & GD&T notes (ISO 8062 CT, Ra, stock)
  • Drawing/RFQ checklist
  • FAQs

Why fillets & radii matter

Sharp corners spike stress (higher Kt) and create hot spots that shrink late and trap gas/inclusions. Proper radii stabilize flow, shorten fill paths, raise yield, and cut machining minutes by avoiding heavy stock in corner clean-ups.

9 proven rules (copy & use)

Indicative ranges. Your drawing/spec and foundry capability prevail.

  • Blend every internal corner — avoid zero-radius re-entrant edges.
  • Radius ratio: start from R ≈ 0.25–0.50 × t (t = thinner wall) for internal fillets; R ≥ 0.2 × t for external.
  • Meet process reality: green sand needs a larger R than the shell at the same wall.
  • Step-downs: use conical/filleted reducers (3:1 to 5:1 taper) instead of abrupt steps.
  • Bosses & pads: tie into ribs with blends; avoid isolated thick bosses.
  • Rib roots: R ≥ 3–5 mm (0.12–0.20 in), plus 50–70% rib thickness fillet at base.
  • Hole to wall: keep edge distance ≥ 1.5–2.0 × hole Ø or add a pad with blends.
  • Machine reliefs: if a sharp outside edge is functional, cast with R and machine a small chamfer later.
  • Call out ranges, not absolutes on drawings (e.g., internal fillets R 3–6 mm), letting foundry optimize for flow.

Radius tables by wall & process

Indicative design starts. Your foundry’s simulation and pattern capability prevail.

Table A — Minimum recommended internal fillet radii by wall & process

Thinner wall tGreen sandResin / no-bakeShell mold
3–4 mm (0.12–0.16 in)R 1.5–2.0 mm (0.06–0.08 in)R 1.2–1.8 mm (0.05–0.07 in)R 1.0–1.5 mm (0.04–0.06 in)
5–7 mm (0.20–0.28 in)R 2.0–3.5 mm (0.08–0.14 in)R 1.8–3.0 mm (0.07–0.12 in)R 1.5–2.5 mm (0.06–0.10 in)
8–12 mm (0.31–0.47 in)R 3.0–5.0 mm (0.12–0.20 in)R 2.5–4.0 mm (0.10–0.16 in)R 2.0–3.5 mm (0.08–0.14 in)
13–20 mm (0.51–0.79 in)R 4.0–7.0 mm (0.16–0.28 in)R 3.5–6.0 mm (0.14–0.24 in)R 3.0–5.0 mm (0.12–0.20 in)

Table B — External edge radii(machining to sharp later if needed)

Edge typeStart fromNotes
Outside cornersR 0.2 × t (min R 1.0–1.5 mm / 0.04–0.06 in)Cast safe, machine to sharp or chamfer
Pad/boss edgeR 2–4 mm (0.08–0.16 in)Keeps coating & flow stable
Rib tipsR 1.5–2.5 mm (0.06–0.10 in)Reduces sand breakage & fins

Transitions & Kt: what to avoid, what to blend

Table C — Transition choices vs stress concentration

GeometryBadBetterWhy
Wall step t₁→t₂Abrupt 90° step3:1 cone + filletLowers Kt; smoother flow
The boss on the wallRib into the wallBoss + pad + blendCuts root stress; sand-friendly
Avoids hot spots & sinkSharp rootLarge root filletCuts root stress; sand friendly
Junction of 3 wallsSharp tri-cornerBlend with spherical filletAvoids last-to-freeze pocket

Rule of thumb: every time you halve the radius, expect a noticeable Kt rise and worse feeding. Err larger if space allows.

Flow-friendly features(feeding & hot-spot tips)

  • Uniformity first: keep sections even; shift mass toward risers; avoid isolated thick pads.
  • Chills & sleeves: allow fillets to stay large while controlling freeze order.
  • Core prints: add blends where cores land; sharp prints crack sand and leak metal.
  • Runner junctions: avoid sharp T-joints; use radius tees and flow-split blends.
  • Vents & fillets: generous fillets improve gas escape paths in sand and reduce erosion.

Machining & GD&T notes(ISO 8062 CT, Ra, stock)

  • CT grades (typical capability): green sand CT9–CT10; resin/no-bake CT8–CT9; shell CT6–CT7 (ISO 8062-3).
  • Surface finish targets: as-cast Ra 6.3–12.5 μm (250–500 μin) green sand; 3.2–6.3 μm (125–250 μin) resin; 1.6–3.2 μm (63–125 μin) shell.
  • Machining stock by mass(iron castings):
  • 5–10 kg (11–22 lb): 1.5–2.5 mm green / 1.2–2.0 mm resin
  • 10–50 kg (22–110 lb): 2.5–3.5 mm green / 2.0–3.0 mm resin
  • GD&T: use datums that sit on blended pads; avoid relying on sharp cast edges.
  • Functional sharpness: if sealing edges must be sharp, cast with a radius, then machine the sealing feature.

Drawing / RFQ checklist(paste-ready)

  • Process & CT:e.g., No-bake, ISO 8062-3 CT8
  • Fillets & radiiInternal fillets per Table A; external edges per Table B
  • TransitionsUse conical/filleted reducers; no abrupt steps
  • Surface & stockMachined faces Ra 3.2–6.3 μm; stock per mass range
  • Hot-spot controlAllow use of chills/sleeves; simulate before tooling
  • Units & spelling:mm/in、kg/lb;include gray/grey once

FAQs

You can, but a better is a range (e.g., R 3–6 mm) plus Table A by wall thickness and process.

Not necessarily—larger radii can improve yield, reduce scrap, and cut machining, often saving net cost.

Blended pads at bosses and ports reduce microshrinkage at seal faces; keep machining stock consistent.

Use the same geometry rules; ductile benefit more from reduced root stress (fatigue). For very thin gray-iron walls, consider a shell for a tighter R.

Yes—cast with radius for flow and machine a light chamfer (e.g., 0.5×45°) for the final look.

Similar Posts