PPAP for Iron Castings: Proven Level Picks + Docs

Guided by YBmetal , PPAP for iron castings: gray/grey & ductile iron castings with machining, simulation-led gating/risers, and traceable QA packs for PPAP/FAI.

Excerpt: This guide shows how to pick PPAP levels for iron castings and which documents actually matter—beyond the generic list. Use our risk-based level matrix, foundry-specific document set, and pilot run plan to reach sign-off with fewer loops.

Table of contents

  • PPAP levels at a glance (1–5)
  • Level selection: risk-based matrix for iron castings
  • What documents matter for castings (and why)
  • Pilot run & capability targets (T0/T1/T2)
  • Drawing & RFQ notes (copy-paste)
  • FAQs

PPAP levels at a glance (1–5)

Table A — PPAP level summary (practical view)

LevelWhat you submitWhen to use
1PSW onlyLow risk, catalog parts, no design change
2PSW + samples + limited dataModerate risk, repeat parts with minor changes
3PSW + samples + full supporting data (default)New tools/parts or key features; most casting programs
4PSW + customer-definedSpecial cases (customer format/systems)
5PSW + full data on-site at supplierSafety/critical parts; audit-style review at foundry

For iron housings with sealing/pressure functions, start at Level 3; consider Level 5 for safety-critical powertrain/brake components.

Level selection — risk-based matrix for iron castings

Table B — Choose your PPAP level

Risk driverExamplesSuggested level
Function criticalPressure-tight housings, brake/powertrain mounts5
New tooling & processNew pattern/coreboxes, route change (green → resin), new heat treat3–5
Thin walls/complex cores≤4–5 mm walls, deep core pockets3–4
Leak/NDT zonesLeak spec, UT/RT/CT defined areas3–5
Only cosmetic/low loadCovers, guards, non-sealing brackets2–3
Repeat order, no changeSame tool/process/supplier1–2

What documents matter for castings (and why)

Below maps the AIAG PPAP 18 elements to the reality of iron casting reality. Use it as your request list and as a supplier pack index.

Table C — PPAP elements with casting-specific evidence

AIAG elementWhat to ask for (casting-focused)Why it matters
1. Design RecordsReleased drawing + CT grade (ISO 8062-3), Ra, stockAligns spec with process reality
2. Engineering ChangeECNs, rev historyTrace design changes
3. Customer Eng ApprovalEmail/meeting minutes approving simulations/toolingProves pre-approval steps
**4. DFMEAIf customer design: risks on wall/ribs/bossesShows design risk thought
**5. Process Flow DiagramMelt → mold → core → pour → knockout → heat treat → machine → test → packBaseline for Control Plan
**6. PFMEARisks: porosity, mismatch, sand collapse, heat-treat warpPrevents common casting failures
**7. Control PlanCT grade, sand SPC, pour temp windows, leak/NDT plan, machining checksDay-to-day control recipe
8. MSA (GR&R)CMM on critical datums/bores; pressure rig repeatabilityTagged, stored at the supplier
9. Dimensional ResultsCMM to datums AB
10. Material/Perf ResultsChemistry (OES), HBW, tensile (A536/A48), microstructure (nodularity)Confirms grade & properties
11. Initial Process StudiesCp/Cpk ≥ 1.33 on key features; leak ppm trendCapability evidence
12. Qualified LabsCalibration + lab scopeValid results
13. Appearance ApprovalUsually N/A for industrial castings
14. Sample PartsT0/T1 samples, master sample taggedVisual & fit proof
15. Master SampleTagged, stored at supplierReference for disputes
16. Checking AidsGo/no-go, CMM fixtures, leak plugsStable measurement setup
17. Records of CSRCustomer-specific requirements listGap check with AIAG
**18. PSWPart Submission Warrant (signed)Formal approval

Casting-specific add-ons (strongly recommended)

  • Simulation screenshots (MAGMA/ProCAST) with riser/chill design
  • Sand system SPC (moisture, compactability, permeability) for green sand
  • Furnace charts for stress relief/normalizing/ADI (if used)
  • Leak curves per serial + NDT (UT/RT/CT) reports for zones
  • Traceability: heat → casting → machining → ship

Pilot run & capability targets (T0/T1/T2)

Table D — Pilot build plan (iron castings)

StageQtyGoalMust-pass criteria
T010–30Process prove-outCMM on criticals; material certs; 100% leak test; NDT per plan
T1 (PPAP/FAI)80–120Capability + docsCp/Cpk ≥ 1.33 on key dims; leak ppm within target; PFMEA/CP/MSA complete
T2 (Run at rate)~300Stability at cycle timeScrap/ppm and cycle time on plan; packing/labels proven

Keep 100% leak test through T1 for pressure parts; relax only after field validation.

Drawing & RFQ notes(paste-ready)

Table E — Copy-paste notes

TopicNote text
PPAP levelTarget PPAP Level 3 (Level 5 for safety-critical). Supplier to propose.
CT & finishISO 8062-3 CT target and as-cast Ra per process; machined faces Ra 3.2–6.3 μm.
CapabilityKey characteristics listed on drawing; Cp/Cpk ≥ 1.33 at T1.
Leak & NDTLeak 0.8–1.5 bar, 30–60 s, curve tied to serial; UT/RT zones as marked.
Heat treatProvide furnace charts; sequence: rough → HT → finish.
DocumentationSubmit PPAP pack items per Table C with simulation and sand SPC.

Why YB Metal for PPAP on castings

  • One roof: green sand/resin/shell + machining & leak benches
  • Simulation-led tooling, CMM/GR&R, leak curves per serial
  • Full PPAP Level 3/5 packs with PFMEA, Control Plan, SPC, and furnace charts

FAQs

It’s the default for new tools/parts. Use Level 5 for safety-critical parts or when the customer wants an on-site review.

Leak test evidence tied to serials, simulation, sand SPC, and GR&R on CMM features.

Common target is Cpk ≥ 1.33 on key dims; negotiate 1.67 for safety-critical features.

Do I need NDT for every casting?

FAI validates one build; PPAP adds process control and capability—needed for sustained production.

Similar Posts