How to Choose a Gray Iron Casting Supplier/Exporter

Gray iron casting supplier

Who this helps: Design Engineers / Buyers qualifying a gray/grey iron casting supplier for housings, machine bases, brake drums, pulleys and other non-pressure parts where NVH damping, machinability and on-time delivery matter.
What you’ll get: a practical supplier-vetting playbook—process capability checks, ISO 8062 CT alignment, pilot/PPAP evidence, export readiness (Incoterms, packaging, documents), a scorecard you can copy-paste, plus internal links (with slugs) and 1–2 authoritative standards links for editors.

Prepared by YB Metal Solution. Share your drawing via /rfqYB Metal will return a short-list of suitable foundries, a pilot run plan and a supplier scorecard, tailored to your part.

Author: YB Metal Solution Engineering Team (hereafter YB Metal)

Table of contents

  • What “good” looks like for a gray iron casting supplier
  • Process capability: match part geometry to molding route
  • Dimensional control: ISO 8062 CT grades, stock & GD&T
  • Quality system & inspection: what to verify (fast)
  • Pilot run → PPAP: evidence you should demand
  • Export readiness: packaging, Incoterms, documents
  • Supplier scorecard
  • RFI/RFQ checklist
  • What YB Metal delivers
  • FAQs

What “good” looks like for a gray iron casting supplier

A reliable gray iron casting supplier/exporter should demonstrate:

  • A fit-for-part molding route (green/resin/shell) with proven yields and no chronic hot-spot shrinkage.
  • Dimensional control to your ISO 8062 CT target, and an agreed machining stock strategy.
  • Stable sand system and core quality (so Ra/defects are repeatable).
  • Inspection depth proportional to risk (material certs + CMM/FAI + visual criteria).
  • Export readiness: packaging that controls rust & impact; Incoterms clarity; clean documents.
  • KPIs they actually track (PPM, OTD, DPPM)—and will share.

If any of the above is “hand-wavy”, plan a pilot before committing tooling.

Process capability: match part geometry to molding route

Choose suppliers whose core process fits your geometry, mass and surface/CT needs:

Red flags: foundry cannot show feeding/chill layouts for T/Y/X junctions; lacks history on parts with similar modulus/section mix. For root-cause literacy, see Fix Shrinkage Porosity

Dimensional control: ISO 8062 CT grades, stock & GD&T

  • Align on CT grade by size band early; supplier confirms as-cast capability and proposes stock for finished datums.
    Reference: ISO 8062 Casting Tolerances Explained
  • Convert critical interfaces into GD&T that respects casting variability.
    Reference: Open GD&T Guide

ISO 9001:2015 – Quality Management Systems

IATF 16949 – Automotive Quality Management

ISO 8062-3:2023 – Casting tolerances (CT grades & machining allowances)

Quality system & inspection: what to verify (fast)

  • QMS: supplier certified to ISO 9001; if you’re automotive, verify IATF 16949 exposure (core tools, customer-specifics).
  • Material control: spectrometer logs tied to heats; tensile on separately cast bars for A48 classes; optional hardness snapshot for machining consistency.
  • Dimensional: CMM/FAI against datum stack; stable fixtures for mass production.
  • Surface: after-blast Ra 6–12 µm (240–475 µin) for paint/powder; process to remove burn-on/silica.
  • Defect prevention: gating/riser plan for your part + evidence of prior sectioning/X-ray on similar hot-spots.

Useful KPI targets (anchor discussion): Foundry Quality KPIs

Pilot run → PPAP: evidence you should demand

  • Packaging: rust control (VCI + oil as needed), edge guards, drop/stack test; moisture indicators for sea freight.
  • Incoterms: align on FOB/CIF/DDP; who owns insurance & customs?
  • Documents: commercial invoice, packing list, HS code, material certs, coating DFT report (if coated), CMM FAI, PPAP summary.

If corrosion is a risk in transit/service, pick a coating stack here:
Coatings vs Material Choices

Supplier scorecard

AreaQuestions to score (0–2–5)Target / notes
Process fitProven parts with similar section mix & weight? Feeding/chill plan provided?5 = shows prior layouts + yields
DimensionalAchieved ISO 8062 CT on similar size band? Stock plan?5 = data + FAI samples
Material controlSpectrometer logs tied to heats? A48 tensile bars?5 = routine + traceable
SurfacePost-blast Ra 6–12 µm repeatable? Burn-on/silica control?5 = measured & pictured
InspectionCMM/FAI depth; gauges maintained; NCR/8D discipline5 = shared past FAIs
KPIsPPM, OTD, DPPM tracked and shared?5 = last 12-mo trend
Export readinessVCI/pack plan; Incoterms clarity; document accuracy5 = templates ready
CommunicationEnglish drawings; change control; weekly update cadence5 = examples shown
Cost/leadRealistic tooling & lead-time; capacity buffer5 = calendar + capacity

(Total /50; short-list ≥35, pilot ≥40.)

RFI/RFQ checklist

Subject: RFI/RFQ – Gray Iron Casting Supplier for [Part Name/No.]

Please provide:
1) Process route recommendation (green/resin/shell) and expected ISO 8062 CT grade.
2) Two references of similar parts (weight/section mix) with yields and CT achieved.
3) Material controls for ASTM A48 Class [30/35/40]; tensile bar type; optional HBW range.
4) CMM/FAI capability; sample report from a similar part.
5) Surface plan: shot-blast media, target Ra, coating stack (if needed) with DFT & adhesion method.
6) Pilot plan: lot size, inspection, traceability, PPAP level and lead-times.
7) Export: packaging spec (VCI/oil), Incoterms, document set (invoice/packing list/HS code/certs).
8) KPIs: last 12 months PPM, OTD, top 3 defect modes and fixes.

Attach: PDF STEP drawing; tolerance scheme; annual volume; required Incoterms.

What YB Metal delivers

YB Metal Solution quotes with a supplier selection pack:

  • Short-list of foundries that match your geometry, CT and volume.
  • Risk-based pilot/PPAP plan, including FAI checklist and evidence requirements.
  • Packaging & Incoterms recommendation for your route (sea/rail/air).
  • Pilot evidence pack: tensile logs, hardness snapshot (if used), CMM FAI on datum stack, coating DFT/adhesion (if coated).

Need a part-specific plan? Upload your drawing at /rfq—we’ll return recommendations and a quote.

FAQs

Not automatically. Many gray-iron “simple” parts hide hot-spot shrinkage or flatness risks. Demand a feeding/chill plan and a pilot with FAI before awarding tools.

For true automotive supply, you’ll want IATF 16949 maturity (core tools, customer-specifics). At minimum, verify experience supplying PPAP with major OEMs/Tier-1s.

Often CT8–CT10 depending on size band and geometry; shell can do tighter. Confirm on pilots and keep stock for finished datums.

Ask for Ra after blast (target 6–12 µm / 240–475 µin) and a coating DFT + adhesion plan.

Start with PPM, OTD %, NCR closure time, 8D turnaround, and DPPM on critical features; review quarterly.

Similar Posts