How to Sourcing Iron Castings in China: Vetting, Audits & Pilot Run Strategy

Guided by YB Metal — sourcing iron castings in China: gray/grey & ductile iron castings with machining, simulation-led process, and traceable QA.

If you’re sourcing iron castings in China, success hinges on three moves: vetting the foundry, auditing the process, and running a pilot with measurable acceptance criteria. This guide gives checklists, tables, and a week-by-week plan to go from first call to stable production—with documentation you can defend.

Table of contents

  • Sourcing iron castings in China — shortlisting signals
  • On-site audit checklist (process, quality, compliance)
  • Pilot run strategy (30/100/300 pcs) with acceptance matrix
  • Drawings & specs that cut risk (ISO 8062, leak, NDT)
  • Timeline, communication & documentation flow
  • Cost, Incoterms, payment & tooling ownership
  • FAQs

Sourcing iron castings in China — shortlisting signals

Screen-in signals

  • Process fit: green sand / no-bake / shell under one roof; in-house machining for bores/faces.
  • Material scope: ductile iron (ASTM A536 / EN 1563), gray/grey iron (ASTM A48), ADI (ASTM A897) if needed.
  • Quality stack: ISO 9001 (IATF-style controls), CMM, leak test benches, UT/RT/CT access.
  • Part family experience: pump/valve/gearbox/tractor housings 5–200 kg (11–441 lb).

Screen out red flags

  • Only cookware/pipe fittings on portfolio(not industrial)
  • No yield data or CT grade capability
  • Outsourced machining/NDT with weak traceability
  • No sample reports (tensile/chemistry/hardness) on hand

Why YB Metal for sourcing iron castings in China

  • One roof: green sand / no-bake / shell + machining
  • Simulation-led gating & risers (MAGMA/ProCAST class)
  • Leak benches with serialized curves; UT/RT/CT access
  • PPAP/FAI docs, CMM, ISO 9001 (IATF-style controls)
  • 48-hour DFM & yield notes on RFQs

On-site audit checklist(paste-ready)

Table A — Process & quality audit (pass/fail + notes)

CT grade by route, visual, and packagingCheckpointsWhat “good” looks likeResult
MeltingCharge control, CE/Si/Mg logs; pour temp windowOES on every heat; pour temp trend within window
MoldingGreen/no-bake/shell parameters; sand SPCMoisture/compactability/permeability charts posted
CoresBinder mix, cure time, storageTagging with time/lot; core bake records
Gating/RisersStandard library; simulationMAGMA/ProCAST screenshots + riser/chill standards
MachiningCMM, tool offset control, coolantFirst-off + hourly checks; GR&R on criticals
Leak testMethod, pressure, time, leak rate0.8–1.5 bar (11.6–21.8 psi), curve logged to serial
NDTUT/RT/CT access & proceduresEN 12681-1 (RT) / EN 12680-3 (UT) references
Final QCCT grade by route, visual, packagingISO 8062-3 CT target posted; OK/NG lanes
TraceabilityHeat → casting → machining → shipBarcode/Traveler; records ≥ 3 years

Pro Tip by YB Metal: Ask for riser/chill standards and at least one simulation screenshot per part. It reveals yield assumptions before you approve tooling.

Pilot run strategy — 30 / 100 / 300 pcs

Table B — Pilot build stages & acceptance

StageQtyPurposeMust-pass criteria
T0 (samples)10–30Process prove-outDimensional on criticals; material certs; leak test 100%; visual AQL
T1 (PPAP/FAI)80–120Capability + docsFAI, control plan, PFMEA, MSA; Cpk ≥ 1.33 on key dims; NDT per plan
T2 (300 pcs run-at-rate)300Rate + stabilityScrap/ppm within target; cycle time hit; packaging/labelling proven

Pro Tip by YB Metal: Keep 100% leak tests through T1 and relax to AQL only after field validation. We pin leak curves to part serials for traceability.

Drawings & specs that cut risk

  • Process & CT grade: e.g., No-bake, ISO 8062-3 CT(shell: CT6–CT7; green sand: CT9–CT10)
  • Surface & stock: machined faces Ra 3.2–6.3 μm (125–250 μin); stock per mass range(see table below)
  • Leak test: method(air under water / dry air mass flow)、pressure 0.8–1.5 bar, hold 30–60 s, allowable leak rate at temp X°C/°F
  • NDT: UT/RT levels & zones; CT for audits
  • Units: show mm/in and kg/lb; include gray/grey spelling once for global clarity

Table C — Typical capability & machining stock

RouteISO 8062-3 CT100 mm tol (indicative)Ra (as-cast / machined)Machining stock (by mass)
Green sandCT9–CT10±1.6–2.4 mm (±0.063–0.094 in)12.5–25 μm / 3.2–6.3 μm5–10 kg: 1.5–2.5 mm;10–50 kg: 2.5–3.5 mm
No-bakeCT8–CT9±1.2–1.8 mm (±0.047–0.071 in)6.3–12.5 μm / 3.2–6.3 μm5–10 kg: 1.2–2.0 mm;10–50 kg: 2.0–3.0 mm
ShellCT6–CT7±0.6–1.0 mm (±0.024–0.039 in)1.6–3.2 μm / 1.6–3.2 μm5–10 kg: 0.8–1.5 mm;10–50 kg: 1.2–2.0 mm

Timeline, communication & documentation

Table D — Week-by-week plan (illustrative)

WeekMilestoneYour actionSupplier output
1NDA + RFQSend prints + specs + CT grade + leak/NDTDFM + quote with yield & lead time
2ShortlistHold video auditFilled pre-audit checklist
3On-site auditApprove action planAudit report + photos
4–5ToolingApprove gating/risersSimulation screenshots + layout
6T0 samplesShip 10–30 pcsMaterial/FAI mini-pack
7–8T1 PPAP/FAIApprove capabilityFull PPAP (FAI, CP, PFMEA, MSA)
9–10T2 300 pcsRun-at-ratePPM + cycle + packaging report
11SOPFreeze settingsControl plan signed

Documentation to require: PO + specs, revision log, simulation, melt logs, FAI/CMM, leak curves tied to serial, NDT reports, packing & labels.

Cost, Incoterms, payment & tooling

Table E — Commercial terms quick guide

TopicGood practice
IncotermsStart FOB China or CIF for landed comparison; move to DAP once stable
Payment30/70 or LC for tooling; net 30–60 for parts after SOP
ToolingYou own the pattern; include refurb plan & storage terms
MOQ & batchesAlign with setup thresholds (e.g., 80/200 pcs) to drop $/pc 8–20%
InspectionThird-party pre-ship for early lots; rely on capability thereafter
IP & printsNDA + watermark; restrict redistribution; control revs via portal

Mini Case Snapshot — illustrative

A North American pump OEM moved a 10–50 kg ductile-iron housing family. With a two-stage pilot (T0→T1) and simulation-driven risers, the team reached stable leak performance and signed off PPAP/FAI on schedule. Documentation included CMM, leak curves per serial, and NDT at hot-spot zones.

FAQs

Define a 100% leak test through T1, call out UT/RT zones, and require melt and pour logs with each lot.

For new tooling: 8–12 weeks, including audit, simulation, tooling, and two sample loops; faster if patterns exist.

Shell gives better CT (CT6–CT7) and thin-wall fill; no-bake is flexible for larger housings with moderate CT (CT8–CT9).

Yes—quotes can list $/kg and $/lb for clarity.

Typically is 30 / 100 / 300 to prove process, capability, and rate before SOP.

Similar Posts